Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 FC Buffalo season

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 00:34, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 FC Buffalo season (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of an article previously deleted by PROD. Concern was that the article fails WP:NSEASONS, not in a top professional league. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 FC Buffalo season. This remains valid. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:31, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:32, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:46, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:54, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Quick clarification: You couldn't have included this article in that nomination, since it was created until ten days after the afd was closed. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:01, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed the previous version of 2015 FC Buffalo season a couple hours after the 2014 AfD closed when I was helping to remove links. It had existed for a couple months (although I can't remember exactly how long). So I proposed the 2015 season for deletion and it was deleted 7 days later. 3 days after that, it was recreated. -- Tavix (talk) 21:11, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.